You need to focus on the intersection of eDiscovery, privacy, and information governance, as Sheila Sadaghiani of CloudNine notes in this post!

The post, titled (wait for it!) The Intersection of eDiscovery, Privacy, and Information Governance and Why You Need to Focus on It — Masters Conference Seattle Recap (available here), recaps a session from the Masters Conference – Seattle, where Doug Kaminski, Chief Revenue Officer at Infinnium and Mike Russell from Expedia Group discussed how organizations are creating and duplicating data faster than they can manage it, and without a strong governance framework, they end up losing control of their information.

Not only that, but governance isn’t just about meeting compliance obligations, it’s about enabling business agility.

Much of this data sits in Microsoft 365, local drives, and shared servers, sometimes duplicated multiple times across custodians. When litigation arises, the result can be overwhelming.

So, what are some key statistics that illustrate today’s challenges? And what’s the ROI for companies that implement governance-first strategies? Find out here, it’s only one click! To find out, your mouse must intersect with the link! 😉

So, what do you think? How is your organization addressing the intersection of eDiscovery, privacy, and information governance? Please share any comments you might have or if you’d like to know more about a particular topic.

Image created using Microsoft Designer, using the term “three colorful broad arrows intersecting”.

Disclosure: CloudNine is an Educational Partner and sponsor of eDiscovery Today

Disclaimer: The views represented herein are exclusively the views of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views held by my employer, my partners or my clients. eDiscovery Today is made available solely for educational purposes to provide general information about general eDiscovery principles and not to provide specific legal advice applicable to any particular circumstance. eDiscovery Today should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a lawyer you have retained and who has agreed to represent you.