Blog

Information Obtained During the Depositions Leads to Re-Opening Discovery: eDiscovery Case Law

In Harms v. Lewis, the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department of New York “unanimously affirmed” an order that granted plaintiff’s motion to compel defendants to comply with certain discovery demands after information obtained during the depositions contradicted defendants’ claim that electronic medical record audit trails were no longer available for discovery.

Emergency Preservation and Limited Forensic Collection Order Entered by Court: eDiscovery Case Law

In Recoop LLC v. Outliers Inc., New York District Judge Lewis J. Liman issued an order regarding Emergency Preservation and Limited Forensic Collection of Recoop LLC business records, requiring Recoop to preserve and suspend auto-deletion for “any Devices/Accounts or physical media that contain Corporate ESI”, with parties to meet and confer regarding selection of a neutral forensic…

AI is Not a Substitute for Good Lawyering, Says Court: eDiscovery Case Law

In White v. Walmart, Inc., Indiana Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker, stating that “Artificial intelligence can be a useful discovery tool. However,…AI is not a substitute for attorneys and litigants exercising independent judgment and oversight in the discovery process”, ordered Plaintiff to “supplement her discovery responses by April 27, 2026.”

Something went wrong. Please refresh the page and/or try again.