Blog

Obviously Relevant Documents Must Be Collected for Non-Disclosed Custodians: eDiscovery Case Law

Shark week, er, eDiscovery Case Week, concludes today! In Wilson Aerospace LLC v. Boeing Co., Washington Magistrate Judge Michelle L. Peterson, stating: “A party therefore cannot justify failing to collect obviously relevant documents on the ground that the relevant employee was not designated as an ‘ESI custodian’ or that such documents might fall outside an…

Random Sample of Training Documents Granted by Court: eDiscovery Case Law

Shark week, er, eDiscovery Case Week, continues today! In Federal Trade Commission v. Uber Technologies, Inc., California Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson granted the FTC’s request for Uber to produce a random sample of the training documents, ordering Uber to “produce a random sample of 300 non-privileged, non-responsive documents from the initial seed set”. However,…

Court Agrees with Plaintiffs on Most Disputed Items: eDiscovery Case Law

Shark week, er, eDiscovery Case Week, continues today!  In the case In re Class Action Settlement Administration Litigation, District of Columbia District Judge John D. Bates stated “The Court agrees with plaintiffs” on several disputes between the parties, including whether Rule 502(b) ought to apply to waiver of privilege, the handling of short message communications…

Something went wrong. Please refresh the page and/or try again.