In this post, Sarena Regazzoni of Hanzo discusses something important to all eDiscovery professionals: navigating cost and proportionality!
Sarena’s post (Navigating Cost and Proportionality in eDiscovery: A Business Perspective, available here) discusses the business impact of eDiscovery costs. You probably know that eDiscovery can be a costly endeavor, with expenses stemming from the collection, processing, review, and production of digital evidence.
What you may not know is that, for businesses, these costs are not just financial but also operational, affecting resource allocation and overall project timelines. As data volumes continue to surge, the potential for eDiscovery to impact a company’s bottom line grows, making cost management an imperative part of strategic planning.
The concept of proportionality is grounded in the idea that the benefits of obtaining particular information should justify the costs incurred. For businesses, this means that eDiscovery efforts must be targeted and rational, focusing on obtaining key information that is most likely to influence the outcome of a case. This approach helps to prevent the discovery process from becoming a financial burden that outweighs its potential advantages in litigation.
I would agree and add that specificity regarding the costs is key to being able to demonstrate proportionality – too many parties in litigation offer boilerplate objections which are routinely waived in court today. The more information you can provide about your costs, the more you can demonstrate a proportional approach.
So, what are four strategies for balancing cost and effectiveness? Read Sarena’s post here to find out! You don’t need a map for navigating cost and proportionality in eDiscovery! 🙂
So, what do you think? How does your organization demonstrate proportionality in eDiscovery? Please share any comments you might have or if you’d like to know more about a particular topic.
Disclaimer: The views represented herein are exclusively the views of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views held by my employer, my partners or my clients. eDiscovery Today is made available solely for educational purposes to provide general information about general eDiscovery principles and not to provide specific legal advice applicable to any particular circumstance. eDiscovery Today should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a lawyer you have retained and who has agreed to represent you.
Discover more from eDiscovery Today by Doug Austin
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.



