September 12, 2022September 12, 2022 Doug Austin

“Clear Deficiencies” in Production Leads to Sanctions for Elon Musk: eDiscovery Case Law

September 6, 2022September 5, 2022 Doug Austin

Beyond Meritless and Utterly Frivolous Defendant Objections Rejected by Court: eDiscovery Case Law

June 21, 2022June 21, 2022 Doug Austin

Unnecessary Disputes by Plaintiff Leads to Granting of Defendant Motions: eDiscovery Case Law

March 29, 2022March 28, 2022 Doug Austin

Selecting Search Terms is Counsels’ Job, Not the Court’s, Says Judge Cole: eDiscovery Case Law

January 4, 2022January 3, 2022 Doug Austin

Motion for Attorney Fees Granted Over Defendants’ Dilatory Tactics: eDiscovery Case Law

October 25, 2021November 14, 2021 Doug Austin

Court Declines to Compel Microsoft to Produce All ESI Retrieved from Search Terms: eDiscovery Case Law

September 8, 2021September 8, 2021 Doug Austin

Time Zone in Which Discovery Requests Were Submitted Decides Timeliness, Rules Court: eDiscovery Case Law

August 17, 2021August 16, 2021 Doug Austin

Court Rules Defendant Responsible for Finding Responsive Documents: eDiscovery Case Law

July 9, 2021July 9, 2021 Doug Austin

Plaintiffs Claim Production by Remington Includes Thousands of Random Cartoons and More: eDiscovery Trends

June 14, 2021June 13, 2021 Doug Austin

Meet and Confer Conferences Have Existed for Nearly 15 Years, But We Have More eDiscovery Disputes Than Ever: eDiscovery Best Practices