January 23, 2023January 22, 2023 Doug Austin

No Deficiency in Plaintiff’s Production Means Denial of Motion to Compel: eDiscovery Case Law

January 6, 2023January 5, 2023 Doug Austin

Metrics Used by Defendant to Object to Search Terms: eDiscovery Case Law

October 26, 2022October 26, 2022 Doug Austin

Special Master Recommends that Defendants Ordered to Resume TAR Process: eDiscovery Case Law

July 19, 2022July 19, 2022 Doug Austin

Geographic Limiters on Searches Rejected by Court: eDiscovery Case Law

June 2, 2022June 2, 2022 Doug Austin

Six Proportionality Factors Used to Decide on Search Terms: eDiscovery Case Law

April 28, 2022April 28, 2022 Doug Austin

ESI Protocol Disputes Addressed by Court: eDiscovery Case Law

March 29, 2022March 28, 2022 Doug Austin

Selecting Search Terms is Counsels’ Job, Not the Court’s, Says Judge Cole: eDiscovery Case Law

March 22, 2022March 22, 2022 Doug Austin

Entire Email Mailboxes Must Be Produced by Defendants, Court Rules: eDiscovery Case Law

December 9, 2021December 9, 2021 Doug Austin

Search Term Requests Granted by Court, But Not Metadata with Production: eDiscovery Case Law

November 3, 2021November 2, 2021 Doug Austin

Court Overrules Most Objections by Defendant on Search Terms: eDiscovery Case Law

July 13, 2021July 12, 2021 Doug Austin

Court Declines to Order Defendant to Redo its Search After Self-Collection: eDiscovery Case Law

May 14, 2021May 13, 2021 Doug Austin

Court Grants Discovery Requests for Both Parties in Cooperation Dispute: eDiscovery Case Law

September 24, 2020September 24, 2020 Doug Austin

Court Finds Angels Somewhat Less Afraid to Tread on Search Terms This Time: eDiscovery Case Law

September 22, 2020September 21, 2020 Doug Austin

If “Angels Fear to Tread” into Search Terms, Why Are Lawyers So Confident About Them?: eDiscovery Best Practices

August 12, 2020August 11, 2020 Doug Austin

Court Grants Part of Plaintiff’s Motion, But Won’t Go “Where Angels Fear to Tread” on Search Terms: eDiscovery Case Week