Earlier today, EDRM hosted the webcast Important eDiscovery Case Law Decisions for September 2020 where we had a great discussion regarding key cases related to cooperation disputes, including disputes related to in camera review, boilerplate objections, forensic analysis and search terms.

As usual, my good friends Tom O’Connor (Director of the Gulf Legal Technology Center), Mary Mack (CEO and Chief Legal Technologist of EDRM) and Craig Ball, President of the firm Craig D. Ball, P.C. had great observations about the cases.  We even stuck in discussion of a “bonus” case that wasn’t originally planned when we promoted the webinar!

If you missed the webinar live, it should be available for on-demand viewing shortly here (keep checking back if not up yet).  And, for those who attended live (or will eventually view it on-demand), here is a link to the slides with summaries of the cases, which in turn have links to the blog posts about the cases themselves and links to the complete case rulings.

So, what do you think?  Are you interested in what courts have to say regarding cooperation disputes like these?  If so, consider checking out the webinar on-demand!  And, please share any comments you might have or if you’d like to know more about a particular topic.

Disclaimer: The views represented herein are exclusively the views of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views held by my employer, my partners or my clients. eDiscovery Today is made available solely for educational purposes to provide general information about general eDiscovery principles and not to provide specific legal advice applicable to any particular circumstance. eDiscovery Today should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a lawyer you have retained and who has agreed to represent you.