It’s eDiscovery Case Law Day! And, “judging” by these cases and the panel, our EDRM October monthly case law webinar is going to be a very interesting discussion!
On Tuesday, October 6th, EDRM will host the webcast Important eDiscovery Case Law Decisions for October 2020 at 1pm ET (noon CT, 10:00am PT). In this webinar, you’ll learn about key cases related to discovery about discovery, the efficacy of terminating sanctions, considerations for audio/video discovery and disputes regarding search terms and technology assisted review (TAR). Topics to be addressed include:
- Proportionality and Discovery about Discovery
- Terminating Sanctions and Copyright Infringement
- Discoverability of Audio/Video Files
- More Disputes Regarding Search Terms
- Technology Assisted Review and Cost Shifting
I will be participating, along with my good friends Tom O’Connor (Director of the Gulf Legal Technology Center) and Mary Mack (CEO and Chief Legal Technologist of EDRM). And, this time, we’ve added Hon. Andrew Peck (Ret.), Senior Counsel at DLA Piper. It’s our usual terrific panel, plus Judge Peck discussing these cases, including two TAR cases! What could be better? Winning the lottery? Well, maybe that… ;o)
Nonetheless, it promises to be an interesting, entertaining and educational discussion regarding some unique cases. Click here to register!
So, what do you think? Are you interested in what our panel is going to say about cases like these? If so, consider attending the webinar! If not, check your pulse! And, please share any comments you might have or if you’d like to know more about a particular topic.
Disclaimer: The views represented herein are exclusively the views of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views held by my employer, my partners or my clients. eDiscovery Today is made available solely for educational purposes to provide general information about general eDiscovery principles and not to provide specific legal advice applicable to any particular circumstance. eDiscovery Today should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a lawyer you have retained and who has agreed to represent you.