In fact, this MAY be one of the best collection of cases we’ve discussed yet! See what I did there? 😉 So, come join us as we discussed them in our May 2022 EDRM case law webinar!
On Tuesday, May 24th, EDRM will host the webcast Important eDiscovery Case Law Decisions for May 2022 at 1pm ET (noon CT, 10:00am PT). In the May 2022 EDRM case law webinar, we’ll discuss cases involving sanctions requests involving inferences, form of production of Salesforce data, disputes over email threading and privilege logs, ESI protocol disputes over search obligations and terms and admissibility of Wayback Machine evidence! Topics to be addressed include:
- Adverse Inference Instruction Request in a Slip and Fall Case
- Sanctions Request Over Admission of Failure to Preserve ESI
- Form of Production of Salesforce Data
- Disputes over Email Threading and Privilege Logs
- ESI Protocol Disputes over Search Obligations and Terms
- Admissibility of Wayback Machine Evidence
I will be participating once again with the usual cast of characters: Tom O’Connor (Director of the Gulf Legal Technology Center), Mary Mack (CEO and Chief Legal Technologist of EDRM) and Hon. Andrew Peck (Ret.), Senior Counsel at DLA Piper. Their expertise in case law and eDiscovery best practices goes “wayback”! 😉
As always, it promises to be an interesting, entertaining and educational discussion regarding some unique cases. Click here to register for our May 2022 EDRM case law webinar!
So, what do you think? Are you interested in what our panel is going to say about cases like these? If so, consider attending the webinar! If not, check out cases covered on eDiscovery Today recently and you will be! And please share any comments you might have or if you’d like to know more about a particular topic.
Disclaimer: The views represented herein are exclusively the views of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views held by my employer, my partners or my clients. eDiscovery Today is made available solely for educational purposes to provide general information about general eDiscovery principles and not to provide specific legal advice applicable to any particular circumstance. eDiscovery Today should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a lawyer you have retained and who has agreed to represent you.