eDiscovery case law disputes never take a holiday! So, come join us as we discuss some great new cases in our July 2022 EDRM case law webinar!

On Thursday, July 28th, EDRM will host the webcast Important eDiscovery Case Law Decisions for July 2022 at 1pm ET (noon CT, 10:00am PT).  In the July 2022 EDRM case law webinar, we’ll discuss cases involving search terms limited by email signatures, timing of motions to compel, third-party subpoena on plaintiff’s counsel, cost shifting to correct production issues, privacy vs. relevance for forensic inspection of China computers and authentication of social media evidence! Topics to be addressed include:

• Limiting Search Terms Based on Email Signatures
• Timing on Motions to Compel
• Third-Party Subpoena on Plaintiff’s Counsel
• Cost Shifting to Correct Production Issues
• Privacy vs. Relevance for Forensic Inspection of China Computers
• Authentication of Social Media Evidence

I will be participating once again with the usual cast of characters: Tom O’Connor (Director of the Gulf Legal Technology Center), Mary Mack (CEO and Chief Legal Technologist of EDRM) and Hon. Andrew Peck (Ret.), Senior Counsel at DLA Piper. Great panelist insights never take a holiday either! 😉

As always, it promises to be an interesting, entertaining and educational discussion regarding some unique cases. Click here to register for our July 2022 EDRM case law webinar!

So, what do you think?  Are you interested in what our panel is going to say about cases like these?  If so, consider attending the webinar!  If not, check out cases covered on eDiscovery Today recently and you will be!  And please share any comments you might have or if you’d like to know more about a particular topic.

Disclaimer: The views represented herein are exclusively the views of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views held by my employer, my partners or my clients. eDiscovery Today is made available solely for educational purposes to provide general information about general eDiscovery principles and not to provide specific legal advice applicable to any particular circumstance. eDiscovery Today should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a lawyer you have retained and who has agreed to represent you.