Did you miss it on E-Discovery Day? If so, you can catch this rebroadcast of the 7 Most Important E-Discovery Cases of 2022, courtesy of EDRM!
Tomorrow, catch this rebroadcast of our E-Discovery Day webinar The 7 Most Important E-Discovery Cases of 2022 at 1pm ET (noon CT, 10am PT), courtesy of EDRM! In this E-Discovery Day case law webinar, we discussed cases related to topics including spoliation of multiple sources of ESI, Salesforce data and form of production, authentication of Wayback Machine evidence, proportionality factors applied to search terms, a default judgment involving “repeated” discovery misconduct, including failing to produce a smoking gun Slack exchange and Special Master denial of a defendants’ TAR request! Topics to addressed include:
- Spoliation of Multiple ESI Sources
- Form of Production of Salesforce Data
- Admissibility of Wayback Machine Evidence
- Adverse Inference Sanctions for Spoliation of Video
- Proportionality Analysis of Search Terms
- Default Judgment and “Smoking Gun” Slack Messages
- Request to Proceed with TAR Approach Denied
We’re giving you the links to the cases we discussed, and we provide a list of other cases that could have easily made the top 7 list during the webinar!
As always, I participated once again with the usual cast of characters: Tom O’Connor (Director of the Gulf Legal Technology Center), Mary Mack (CEO and Chief Legal Technologist of EDRM) and Hon. Andrew Peck (Ret.), Senior Counsel at DLA Piper. ‘Tis the season for case law disputes! 😉
It was an interesting, entertaining and educational discussion regarding some unique cases. Click here to catch this rebroadcast of our E-Discovery Day webinar on EDRM’s BrightTalk network!
So, what do you think? Are you interested in what our panel already said about cases like these? If so, consider attending the webinar! If not, check out cases covered on eDiscovery Today recently and you will be! And please share any comments you might have or if you’d like to know more about a particular topic.
Disclaimer: The views represented herein are exclusively the views of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views held by my employer, my partners or my clients. eDiscovery Today is made available solely for educational purposes to provide general information about general eDiscovery principles and not to provide specific legal advice applicable to any particular circumstance. eDiscovery Today should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a lawyer you have retained and who has agreed to represent you.
