Seven Methods of Review

Seven Methods of Review to Optimizing Efficiency and Accuracy: eDiscovery Best Practices

This latest post from OpenText discusses seven methods of review, with seven questions to ask regarding review – and more!

The post (Sometimes in eDiscovery more is better, written by Wendy Cole) discusses optimizing efficiency and accuracy with seven methods of review. And it points out – via the 2023 State of the Industry Report from eDiscovery Today – how many different use cases there are for eDiscovery technology and workflows today. In addition to litigation (96% of respondents), the expanded use cases for eDiscovery technology and workflows ranged from arbitration (51%) and investigations (83%) to breach incidence responses (47%), to privacy requests (42%), government information requests (48%) and HSR Second Requests (43%).

With so many use cases, a one-size-fits-all approach to document review itself will not guarantee optimized outcomes for every case, whether litigation or investigations or emerging use cases. As a result, Wendy gives you seven questions to think about for your next document review project – and whether you are employing the approach that best matches your case objectives.

What are the seven questions? Find out here! It’s only one more click.

Not only that, check out their additional resources to find out more about the seven methods of review, including the OpenText and ACEDS webinar Optimizing Document Review for Today’s Expanding Discovery Use Cases on Tuesday, February 21 at 1 PM ET with Tom Gricks (Lead Strategy Consultant at OpenText), Tracy Drynan (Principal Consultant at OpenText) and me! More on that later this week! 🙂

Remember that all eDiscovery Today partner events are available via the Events Calendar here! Check it out to see what’s coming next!

So, what do you think? Please share any comments you might have or if you’d like to know more about a particular topic.


Disclosure: OpenText is an Educational Partner of eDiscovery Today

Disclaimer: The views represented herein are exclusively the views of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views held by my employer, my partners or my clients. eDiscovery Today is made available solely for educational purposes to provide general information about general eDiscovery principles and not to provide specific legal advice applicable to any particular circumstance. eDiscovery Today should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a lawyer you have retained and who has agreed to represent you.

Leave a Reply