See what I did there? đ Actually, it wasnât me â Jessica Lee of ProSearch has written a new guide on emoji considerations in eDiscovery which has a lot of good information!
The guide (Little Pictures Worth a Thousand Words: Emoji Considerations in eDiscovery, available here, with accompanying blog post here) provides a good discussion about emojis*, including what makes them complicated, the challenges for eDiscovery and five key factors to consider. The graphic above came from that guide. Here are some notable emoji stats for you:
- An estimated 95% of internet users have sent an emoji at some point.
- 10 billion emojis are sent every day.
- 3,664 emojis are recognized by the Unicode Consortium
- 75% of global emoji users say itâs okay to only send an emoji as a quick response, instead of words.
- Almost 90% of global emoji users believe that emojis make it easier to communicate across language barriers.
Jessicaâs guide to emoji considerations in eDiscovery is an easy read â just an 8-page PDF with title and end pages taking up two of those, and lots of graphics (for obvious reasons). Check out her guide here! Talking about emojis is like talking about Fight Club, people donât talk about it. Thanks to Jessica for talking about it!
So, what do you think? Does your organization have a plan for handling emojis in eDiscovery? Please share any comments you might have or if youâd like to know more about a particular topic.
*I still contend the plural of emoji is emoji, but so many add an âsâ, that Iâve decided to join the crowdâŚ
Disclosure: ProSearch is an Educational Partner and sponsor of eDiscovery Today
Disclaimer: The views represented herein are exclusively the views of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views held by my employer, my partners or my clients. eDiscovery Today is made available solely for educational purposes to provide general information about general eDiscovery principles and not to provide specific legal advice applicable to any particular circumstance. eDiscovery Today should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a lawyer you have retained and who has agreed to represent you.