In a recent blog post, Eric Wall of Syllo asks a bold question: Is the death of outsourced document review happening in 2025?

In the blog post, titled Is 2025 the Year That Outsourced Document Review Dies? and available here, Eric says: “In 2024, the legal industry reached a tipping point. After reviewing the speed with which generative AI (GenAI) could review large data sets, and seeing that GenAI was better than human reviewers at categorizing documents, law firm partners quickly realized that GenAI would be the future of first-level document review.  Initial skepticism about data security and accuracy gave way to tangible results — faster workflows, cost savings, and higher accuracy than human reviewers could achieve alone.”

Continuing, he says: “By 2025, what was once a whisper in the hallways of AmLaw200 firms is becoming an open secret: GenAI is reshaping the document review process, and outsourced review as we know it may soon be a relic of the past. Rather than outsource review to managed review providers, law firms are using platforms that enable automated first-level review, like Syllo, to take large reviews back in house.  Smarter, more targeted review has meant that firms can bill attorney time for factual investigation.  Revenue that once flowed to third-party managed review firms is now flowing back into law firms.”

So, what specific benefits of Generative AI review does Eric discuss in his post? And how accurate can GenAI review be? Find out here, it’s only one click! Unless you’re afraid of death, that is! 😉

So, what do you think? Do you think the death of outsourced document review is on the horizon? Please share any comments you might have or if you’d like to know more about a particular topic.

Image created using Bing Image Creator Powered by DALL-E, using the term “robot lawyer holding flowers and standing at a gravesite with a headstone that says ‘Here Lies Document Review’”.

Disclosure: Syllo is an Educational Partner and sponsor of eDiscovery Today

Disclaimer: The views represented herein are exclusively the views of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views held by my employer, my partners or my clients. eDiscovery Today is made available solely for educational purposes to provide general information about general eDiscovery principles and not to provide specific legal advice applicable to any particular circumstance. eDiscovery Today should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a lawyer you have retained and who has agreed to represent you.