Are you looking for validation? Who isn’t? 😉 Here’s a webinar from eDiscovery Today discussing evaluating methods for eDiscovery review!

On Thursday, September 18th at 1pm ET (noon CT, 10am PT), eDiscovery Today will be presenting the webinar titled Looking for Validation: Evaluating Methods for Review in eDiscovery Today (see what we did there?). Join me as I discuss the different methods of review and the considerations for evaluating each method of review. Topics include:

• Why keyword search shouldn’t get the “free pass” it usually gets
• What Sedona Principle 6 really expects
• Measuring the effectiveness of your review approach
• Will generative AI replace TAR for review?
• Iterative approaches to improving results
• Six reasons to validate your review approach

Let’s face it: There are more approaches than ever for conducting review in eDiscovery. Keyword search and manual review is the traditional approach, but how can we ensure that it’s effective? Predictive coding (aka, Technology Assisted Review/TAR) is highly structured, but many legal professionals don’t understand it. Generative AI is the “new kid on the block”, but what can we do to limit hallucinations and help ensure comprehensive results?

If you’re looking for validation in your review for eDiscovery, register here and join me for eDiscovery Today’s first ever hosted webinar on Thursday, September 18th!

So, what do you think? Are you looking for validation in your eDiscovery review workflows? If so, then register for the webinar! And please share any comments you might have or if you’d like to know more about a particular topic.

Image created using Microsoft Designer, using the term “robot lawyer examining a laptop under a microscope”.

Disclaimer: The views represented herein are exclusively the views of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views held by my employer, my partners or my clients. eDiscovery Today is made available solely for educational purposes to provide general information about general eDiscovery principles and not to provide specific legal advice applicable to any particular circumstance. eDiscovery Today should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a lawyer you have retained and who has agreed to represent you.