Syllo says that stitching together a platform just doesn’t work. Here, they make their case for the inevitability of the unified litigation platform.

In their post titled (wait for it!) The Inevitability of the Unified Litigation Platform (available here), Syllo notes that, while eDiscovery platforms, case management tools and transcript management software are powerful within their lanes, none were designed to interoperate. Naturally, each developed its own unique way of representing documents, case related information, and litigation specific workflows. Decades of acquisitions and API integrations have connected many litigation tools at the surface level without changing that underlying condition.

Legal AI is now being deployed into that fragmented stack. The implications of this lack of integration can already be felt as legal professionals seek to access and navigate adequate context to produce useful analyses and work products.

Modern tech stacks are not designed to support the interconnected nature of litigation. eDiscovery platforms are separate from case management tools, which are separate from legal research tools—not because they are disconnected aspects of the litigation workflow, but because of the technical challenges inherent to building a litigation platform that spans the full litigation lifecycle.

Still, this continuous, recursive inference about what matters in a case (and why) is the reasoning pattern that AI is being asked to replicate. But an AI system cannot do that properly without access to adequate case context at every stage. The industry has pursued two paths to working around these constraints, but neither has produced a coherent solution.

So, what are two paths to stitching together a platform, and why do both fall short? Find out here, it’s only one click! Curiosity makes it inevitable that you’ll click! 😉

So, what do you think? Do you feel that your litigation solution is stitched together? Please share any comments you might have or if you’d like to know more about a particular topic.

Image created using DALL-E-3, using the term “a Frankenstein-like robot stumbling around”.

Disclosure: Syllo is an Educational Partner and sponsor of eDiscovery Today

Disclaimer: The views represented herein are exclusively the views of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views held by my employer, my partners or my clients. eDiscovery Today is made available solely for educational purposes to provide general information about general eDiscovery principles and not to provide specific legal advice applicable to any particular circumstance. eDiscovery Today should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a lawyer you have retained and who has agreed to represent you.