In her own unique style, Angie Nolet of TransPerfect Legal discusses the future of discovery involving construction litigation AI! Check it out!

In her post titled (wait for it!) The Docuswamp: Construction Litigation AI and the Future of Discovery (available here), Angie draws on her experience as in-house counsel, where she says: “I had a rule: on the first substantive call with my outside lawyer, I wanted two things: (1) the projected cost to litigate through written discovery, and (2) an honest liability read. Not the Pollyanna version. Not the mealy-mouthed ‘we have strong arguments’ version that drags the engagement out for another six months. My outside lawyers had to take a position and say it with their whole chest.”

After being burned several times, “one dark and stormy Seattle day, a partner from a California law firm changed it all. She called me two days after I sent her a case. Get out, she said. The exposure is real, the defenses are weak, and the cost of fighting this to its logical conclusion doesn’t pencil. She billed almost nothing on that matter.”

As Angie noted: “She got every subsequent matter I had to give. And the partners who’d hedged? They got their invoices paid and their relationships quietly composted.”

What does that have to do with construction litigation AI? As Angie notes: “Construction litigation AI is what makes that shift possible—bringing faster, more defensible answers to discovery from the outset. The salient question is whether your firm is positioned to deliver it or whether you’re still billing dozens of hours to find out, one milquetoast memo at a time.”

So, why should you “Litigate Like Charlie Day”? (yes, that Charlie Day). What is the “Quadrumvirate”? And what does Angie mean by “Once Your Clients Taste Caviar, They Won’t Go Back to Cheetos”? Find out here, it’s only one click! “You cannot get honey from a hornets’ nest!” 😉

So, what do you think? Are you utilizing AI for construction litigation? Please share any comments you might have or if you’d like to know more about a particular topic.

Image created using DALL-E-3, using the term “robot lawyer wearing a suit sitting in a law office eating caviar with a bag of cheese puffs in the background”.

Disclosure: TransPerfect Legal is an Educational Partner and sponsor of eDiscovery Today

Disclaimer: The views represented herein are exclusively the views of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views held by my employer, my partners or my clients. eDiscovery Today is made available solely for educational purposes to provide general information about general eDiscovery principles and not to provide specific legal advice applicable to any particular circumstance. eDiscovery Today should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a lawyer you have retained and who has agreed to represent you.