OpenAI recently announced conversational voice models called GPT-Live. I thought “why not interview it?”. So, here’s my interview with ChatGPT.

I covered the announcement on the Kitchen Sink week before last. My son Carter has already been using the feature quite a bit on the ChatGPT app on his phone. So, I thought I would try it, but instead of just playing around with the feature, I thought I would “interview” ChatGPT about key eDiscovery and AI related topics.

So, I identified a few questions to ask, opened the ChatGPT app on my phone, hit the button to start the conversation and proceeded from there. Apparently, my ChatGPT voice is a proper English woman that sounds (sort of) like Julie Andrews. At least “she” doesn’t sound like Scarlett Johansson. 😉

After exchanging pleasantries (and reminding the AI model that it can’t be doing well or badly when I ask it how it’s doing because it’s just an AI model), I asked the model if I could conduct an interview related to eDiscovery, AI and other types of technology. I also told ChatGPT that I wanted to “discuss general trends, considerations, and challenges, but not mention any providers by name”.

I also asked it what model it was and it responded that it was “ChatGPT running on GPT-5.5” and then said it was “ready whenever you want to start the interview”.

In my interview with ChatGPT, I proceeded to ask questions related to:

• The biggest eDiscovery related challenges that legal professionals are facing today;
• Types of modern data that eDiscovery professionals should be focusing on, and how AI generated data factors into that discussion;
• The biggest misperceptions about AI and generative AI;
• What the legal profession needs to do to reduce the number of filings containing AI hallucinations;
• How the use of AI in eDiscovery platforms differs from the use of AI in public AI models like ChatGPT;
• The biggest mistakes that organizations make when implementing an AI solution to support business needs, including needs related to eDiscovery;
• Best practices ChatGPT recommends for ensuring the quality of work product when using generative AI capabilities within an eDiscovery solution; and
• What ChatGPT thinks the landscape of eDiscovery solutions looks like in five years, and how AI will factor into that future landscape.

A couple of observations:

• I expected the verbose ChatGPT I’m used to when I submit written prompts and get written responses. Conversational ChatGPT is much briefer and probably not geared up to be “interviewed” like I did.
• As a result, most of the answers were a bit light on details. Perhaps some of them warranted following up on, but I decided to mostly stick to the questions I planned to ask in advance to keep things moving.
• I say “so” a lot. 😲

So (there I go again!), I wouldn’t exactly call this a “thought leader” interview; in fact, ChatGPT was a lot less informative than it normally is when I’m submitting similar questions in written form. Maybe that should be the next experiment for comparison purposes? 🤔

The transcript of my interview with ChatGPT is here. And the audio of the interview is below (note: the first 20 seconds is silent as I guess I didn’t realize I had already started recording when I was opening the app to conduct the interview). Also, my voice is much louder than the soft-spoken British woman. 😉

So(!), what do you think? Are AI chatbots to the point where we can have intelligent conversations with them? Please share any comments you might have or if you’d like to know more about a particular topic.

Image created using MAI-Image-2.5-Flash, using the term “create a picture of a guy that looks like the uploaded picture (of me) interviewing a robot”.

Disclaimer: The views represented herein are exclusively the views of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views held by my employer, my partners or my clients. eDiscovery Today is made available solely for educational purposes to provide general information about general eDiscovery principles and not to provide specific legal advice applicable to any particular circumstance. eDiscovery Today should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a lawyer you have retained and who has agreed to represent you.