General enforcement of the EU AI Act is live. Here’s Part 2 of ProSearch‘s discussion of classifying your eDiscovery workflows for EU AI Act readiness.

In the conclusion of the two-part blog post series written by Odette Nazarian Claridge titled (wait for it!) EU AI Act Readiness for Corporate Legal: Classifying Your eDiscovery Workflows – PART TWO (available here), Odette notes that two organizations can use the exact same AI tool and face very different obligations under the Act.

The reason is because the EU AI Act regulates not only the technology itself, but also the role an organization plays in relation to that technology. Whether you are a provider or a deployer can significantly alter your responsibilities. For legal departments and organizations increasingly experimenting with customization, integrations, and generative AI workflows, understanding that distinction is becoming just as important as understanding the technology itself.

So, what are some practical tips for the in-house team? And what’s a good checklist to start with? Find out here, it’s only one click! Clicking should be your first checklist item! 😉

If you missed it, here’s part one where Odette examined the EU AI Act’s risk-based framework and the importance of classifying eDiscovery technologies appropriately.

So, what do you think? Is your organization classifying your eDiscovery workflows for EU AI Act readiness? Please share any comments you might have or if you’d like to know more about a particular topic.

Image created using DALL-E 3, using the term “robot lawyer wearing a suit holding up two peace signs”.

Disclosure: ProSearch is an Educational Partner and sponsor of eDiscovery Today

Disclaimer: The views represented herein are exclusively the views of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views held by my employer, my partners or my clients. eDiscovery Today is made available solely for educational purposes to provide general information about general eDiscovery principles and not to provide specific legal advice applicable to any particular circumstance. eDiscovery Today should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a lawyer you have retained and who has agreed to represent you.