Tomorrow’s EDRM Case Law Webinar Will Have a Bonus Case!: eDiscovery Webinars

It’s EDRM week!  We had so much fun last month, our EDRM November monthly case law webinar tomorrow is going keep the same group together for an encore of great takes about interesting eDiscovery case law!

Tomorrow, EDRM will host the webcast Important eDiscovery Case Law Decisions for November 2020 at 1pm ET (noon CT, 10:00am PT).  In this webinar, you’ll learn about several disputes over production of potentially responsive ESI and potential sanctions for failing to produce ESI.  Topics to be addressed include:

  • Third Party Subpoenas and Rule 45
  • Case Concessions to Avoid Producing Responsive ESI
  • Rule 37(e) and Inherent Authority in Sanctions Rulings

We will have three cases related to that last point.  But there will be a BONUS case too – a new ruling on a Technology Assisted Review (TAR) case we covered last month!

Advertisement
UnitedLex

I will be participating once again with Tom O’Connor (Director of the Gulf Legal Technology Center), Mary Mack (CEO and Chief Legal Technologist of EDRM) and Hon. Andrew Peck (Ret.), Senior Counsel at DLA Piper.  Third party subpoenas, sanctions and another TAR ruling!  Better bring your FRCP rule book!

It promises to be an interesting, entertaining and educational discussion regarding some unique cases.  Click here to register!

So, what do you think?  Are you interested in what our panel is going to say about cases like these?  If so, consider attending the webinar!  If not, check out the recent cases covered on eDiscovery Today and you will be!  And, please share any comments you might have or if you’d like to know more about a particular topic.

Disclaimer: The views represented herein are exclusively the views of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views held by my employer, my partners or my clients. eDiscovery Today is made available solely for educational purposes to provide general information about general eDiscovery principles and not to provide specific legal advice applicable to any particular circumstance. eDiscovery Today should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a lawyer you have retained and who has agreed to represent you.

Advertisement
Casepoint

Leave a Reply