When setting guardrails for responsible AI use in legal practice, training is not enough. This EDRM webinar has the experts to discuss what is enough!

Next Tuesday, June 2, EDRM will host the webinar titled (wait for it!) Training Is Not Enough: Guardrails for Responsible AI Use in Legal Practice (available here) at 2pm ET (1pm CT, 11am PT). This EDRM program moves beyond the familiar call for AI education. Training matters, but it is not enough. Responsible AI use requires systems that reinforce professional judgment at the point of use: tool-level guardrails, workflow protocols, human-in-the-loop review, audit trails, and team practices that make verification and supervision reliable.

Retired Judge Ralph Artigliere will moderate a practical discussion with a terrific group of panelists including Professor William Hamilton, Senior Legal Skills Professor and Director, UF Law International Center for Automated Information Retrieval, Suzanne H. Clark, Esq., CEDS, Of Counsel – Mass Torts Discovery Counsel, Beasley Allen Law Firm, Rose Hunter Jones, Partner, Hilgers PLLC and Dr. Varun Perumal Chadalavada, Head of AI Strategy, OrcaWorcs AI. These panelists have already had a lot to say about this important issue!

Advertisement

Let’s face it: AI is no longer waiting at the edge of legal practice. It is already inside the work. But adoption has outpaced governance. Some legal organizations have little or no training, no clear guidance, and no reliable safeguards. Others have policies, workflows, designated AI leaders, and emerging tool-level guardrails. The question is no longer whether legal professionals will use AI. The question is whether they can use it responsibly, effectively, and consistently under the pressures of real practice. Register here to learn best practices for setting guardrails for responsible AI use in legal practice next Tuesday!

So, what do you think? Are you interested in learning responsible AI use in legal practice? If so, consider attending the webinar!  And please share any comments you might have or if you’d like to know more about a particular topic.

Disclaimer: The views represented herein are exclusively the views of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views held by my employer, my partners or my clients. eDiscovery Today is made available solely for educational purposes to provide general information about general eDiscovery principles and not to provide specific legal advice applicable to any particular circumstance. eDiscovery Today should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a lawyer you have retained and who has agreed to represent you.