Be afraid, be very afraid of the consequences for failing to preserve or produce ESI in these new and interesting eDiscovery case law disputes in our October 2022 EDRM case law webinar!
On Monday, October 31st, EDRM will host the webcast Important eDiscovery Case Law Decisions for October 2022 at 1pm ET (noon CT, 10:00am PT). In the October 2022 EDRM case law webinar, we’ll discuss disputes including a motion to compel prior to meet and confer, quashing a third-party subpoena after publicly objecting to it and four cases involving requests for sanctions for spoliating ESI! Topics to be addressed include:
- Motion to Compel Prior to Meet and Confer
- Quashing a Third-Party Subpoena After Public Objection
- Potential Sanctions for Spoliation of Text and Signal Messages
- Potential Sanctions for Continued Spoliation in International Case
- Potential Sanctions for Spoliation of Potentially Infringing Videos
- Potential Sanctions for Changing Slack Retention After Duty to Preserve
I will be participating once again with the usual cast of characters: Tom O’Connor (Director of the Gulf Legal Technology Center), Mary Mack (CEO and Chief Legal Technologist of EDRM) and Hon. Andrew Peck (Ret.), Senior Counsel at DLA Piper. There are no tricks, only treats with this group! 😉
As always, it promises to be an interesting, entertaining and educational discussion regarding some unique cases. Click here to register for our October 2022 EDRM case law webinar!
So, what do you think? Are you interested in what our panel is going to say about cases like these? If so, consider attending the webinar! If not, check out cases covered on eDiscovery Today recently and you will be! And please share any comments you might have or if you’d like to know more about a particular topic.
Disclaimer: The views represented herein are exclusively the views of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views held by my employer, my partners or my clients. eDiscovery Today is made available solely for educational purposes to provide general information about general eDiscovery principles and not to provide specific legal advice applicable to any particular circumstance. eDiscovery Today should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a lawyer you have retained and who has agreed to represent you.